Module+3


 * The link that I thought was a reliable source was link 1. I thought this site was more reliable because this website has dates, references, places to contact, other links to click on that provide information, and an author. It has all the things that we learned about in the article "five w's of website evaluation". Link number two didn't seem to have any of those things. There were no dates anywhere on the page, it didn't provide an author or place to contact anyone regarding the information, and it didn't have any references to say if the information was valid or where it came from.**